Why Citizens Should Not Support a New Government that Mirrors the Old or previous government doings

Why Citizens Should Not Support a New Government that Mirrors the Old or previous government doings.

In democratic societies, the electorate possesses the power to shape governance through their votes. When a political party fails to deliver on its promises or exhibits behavior that contradicts the values and needs of its citizens, the electorate has the right to vote it out of power. However, the situation becomes precarious when the new government elected to replace the old one begins to replicate the very actions and policies that led to the previous party’s downfall. This article discusses why citizens should remain vigilant and not support a new government that behaves similarly to the one they ousted.



1. Continuation of Corrupt Practices

When citizens vote a party out of power due to corruption, they inherently express a desire for integrity and transparency in governance. If a new government emerges and adopts similar corrupt practices—such as nepotism, bribery, or lack of accountability—it becomes a betrayal of public trust. Citizens should recognise that supporting such a government undermines their own values and erodes the foundations of democracy. I wish a praise singer can understand this clearly and stop comparison with wrong past mistakes to justify wrongs now; unless otherwise one is different.



In this context, citizens must demand accountability and transparency rather than accept the status quo. Failing to do so sends a message that corrupt practices are tolerated as long as they come from a different political party or as long as it has been happening in the past. This is too wrong to emphasise.



2. Protecting the Will of the People

Consider a scenario where the previous government implemented policies that disproportionately affected marginalised communities, such as austerity measures or cuts to social programs, Bill 10 to Bill 7. If the new government continues these harmful policies, it indicates a disregard for the will of the people who voted for change.



Citizens must be adamant in their refusal to support any administration that fails to prioritise the needs of the populace. By holding the new government accountable for its actions, the electorate reinforces the idea that their votes represent a desire for real change, not merely a shift in leadership or political party as we have sifted from carders to praise singers.



3. The Danger of Political Complacency

When citizens support a new government that mimics the failures of its predecessor, they risk of creating a cycle of political complacency. This complacency can lead to a lack of engagement among the electorate, as people may feel that their votes do not matter if the outcome is merely a repetition of past mistakes. Here I am not encouraging the citizens not to turn out in numbers on the polling day. Not at all. But that, it  contributes to voter apathy.


However, to break this cycle, citizens must actively participate in the political process by voicing their concerns and demanding that the new government take a different approach. Engaging in civic duties, attending town hall meetings, and advocating for policy changes are essential ways to ensure that the government remains responsive to the electorate. I urge all, especially the praise singers to stop supporting wrong things because they were being done before, but call a wrong then as a wrong now. This is not hate or jealousy but a right of every well meaning citizens who feel for the country.

4.  Lack of Innovation

A new government that fails to innovate or adapt in response to the challenges faced by its citizens is not fulfilling its mandate. If the new leadership implements the same policies (such as nepotism, regionalism) that citizens rejected, it suggests a lack of creativity and responsiveness to the evolving needs of society.

Citizens should be vigilant in critically evaluating the actions of their leaders. Supporting a government that does not strive for improvement or does not introduce fresh ideas is tantamount to accepting mediocrity. Active engagement and scrutiny can stimulate meaningful discussion and push leaders toward progressive solutions.

5.  Establishing New Norms:

When citizens hold a new government accountable for repeating the mistakes of its predecessor, they contribute to establishing a culture of accountability and tribalism or jealousy as purported by praise singers in our country. Thus, this culture ensures that political leaders understand that their actions will be scrutinised and that they must adhere to the principles of good governance.

By refusing to support a government that does not uphold the values and expectations set forth by the electorate, citizens encourage the development of political norms that prioritise integrity, transparency, and responsiveness over rudeness.

In summary: The Power of a Discerning Electorate.

The act of voting is only the beginning of civic engagement. Citizens must remain vigilant and discerning, ensuring that their elected representatives are held accountable for their actions. Supporting a new government that mirrors the failures of the previous one undermines the very principles of democracy, change and accountability, otherwise, it is best you just bring back the precious government as you wait to find another serious political party that means real change to cut and paste leaders.

Furthermore, as stewards of change, citizens must continue to advocate for policies and practices that reflect their needs and aspirations. By refusing to support a government that does not honor the mandate of the people, citizens can foster a political environment that encourages genuine progress and accountability. Ultimately, it is not just about changing leadership; it is about ensuring that those in power truly represent the will and welfare of the people they serve above their selfish interests. Puting the interests of the country first to remaining royal to a political party in government, as bad decision will not only affect your neighbours but even you too. So, do not be fooled.

Write
Chansa Patrick
Political Consultant
Philosopher and
Lecturer in History of Philosophy.

Putting The Country First!

John 8:32 “And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Get in touch with us on  WhatsApp +263786654620
#zambianwhistleblower #zwb
©️ Zambian Whistleblower

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version