Dani Pule demands removal of magistrate from so called Zambezi Region from his trial, but accepts lawyers from ‘Zambezi Region’ to defend him. Paradox!

HIGH-STAKES TRIAL AGAINST DANNY PULE HITS SNAG, ADJOURNED TO JUNE 21ST.

In a dramatic turn of events, the highly anticipated trial of Christian Democratic Party president Danny Pule failed to commence today as expected. Pule faces charges of Seditious Practices.

The prosecution was poised to present its case, but Pule’s legal team raised a preliminary issue, alleging bias on the part of the court due to its connection to the Zambezi region, which is at the centre of the alleged charge.

According to an affidavit filed in support of the preliminary issue raised, the deponent, Mr. Danny Pule, states that:

“Records before this honourable Court will show that I have been charged with an Offence of Seditious practices… The particulars of the Offence are that it is alleged that I uttered seditious words to promote feelings of ill will or hostility between different communities or different parts of a community.”

He further states that:

“The offence that I have been charged alleges that the subject community being affected is that of the Zambezi region of Zambia which includes Western, Northwestern and Southern… I know as a matter of fact that the Court before which I am appearing is Tonga from the Southern Province.”

Mr. Pule alleges that:

“There is a high likelihood that I may not be fairly tried as it is apparent that some biases may arise out of the Courts position in terms of tribe and where the Court hails from… It is my Constitutional right to be regarded innocent until proven guilty and to have a fair trial before an impartial tribunal.”

He also states that:

“I have noticed that this Honourable Court is being presided over by Your Worship a member of the Zambezi region which is the subject matter in the charge that has been levelled against me… In order for me to have a fair hearing and the need to have my matter adjudicated by an impartial tribunal I want the matter to be adjudicated upon by someone in whom I have confidence there will be no trap

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *